By message from by elections

The new hope opposition received through by election results needs to be objectively interpreted and acted upon by them.
Though there is a confusion regarding what actually public consensus regarding BJP and Congress are, as the results in by polls and assembly elections are 180 degrees divergent, few insights can be clearly concluded:

  1. Not everyone has turned bhakt and People are looking for an alternative, if not to elect, atleast to hedge against.
  2. Politics of competition among the shattered opposition will never allow them to pose a credible challenge to Modi, while coalition MAY play wonders. But public also understands that coalition government will only try to satisfy their partners and not the voters. So they find single party majority government better, even if they are authoritarian. So, opposition will have to portray themselves as one big unit rather than a mosaic comprising different and divergent colors.
  3. Youth (those who can still exercise their freedom of thought and expression and are not Bhakts), specially those unemployed are looking for another leader, but are not able to accept Rahul Gandhi as the same, even after congress trying to hard sell him!
  4. These momentary celebrations and adrenal spikes after 1-2 Victories will not create much difference to BJP nor the opposition. Only thing they can gain is experience and a message from its analysis, if done devoid of any self boasting and over confidence.

Now a days Gandhian congress is trying to copy modi’s style of speech, visible in terms of one liner, rhymes etc., and its actually ironic that they are trying to imitate whom they want to replace, despite the fact that Gandhi ji use to say “be the change you want to see in world” and not “be the one you want to change in world” 😀

‘Grey’ move against black money

​Its a dangerous trend that PM modi has set in.  Though he must be applauded for his bold steps towards reforms in governance and fight against corruption,  but with a bit of care.  

His move to de- monetise high value currency is a bold and quite needed step,  but the timing and method is questionable.  Here are few questions that still remain in my mind unanswered. 

1. Timing: This time of the year is well known for festivals, marriages and tourism. Yet,  it was chosen as appropriate time to detonate this bomb which resulted in several deaths in family which were preparing for marriage celebrations,  pushed foreign tourists into utter chaos and forget about festivities, it created dearth of sufficient food and livelihood.  Its well accepted that these are short term issues,  and because of this understanding, i fail to digest and interpret why this period of year was chosen by the intellectuals who could contemplated the problems that people might face quite fairly,  but not these big issues.  This timing makes sense if i attach political motives of BJP to this move of National good! 

Uttar Pradesh and punjab elections are around the corner.  

2. Will this really curb black money in long run? This move will certainly squash the black money, to some extent, in circulation at present moment but does not guarantee anyway that new black money hoarding will not take place in future.  Instead it will be doubly easier for new hoarding with new double denomination currency notes. 

3. BJP fundings: there were allegations regarding the huge sums of money that BJP spent in its election campaign in 2014. And most of it was funded by big corporate families. I do not and cannot buy the argument that BJP did not take ‘preventive’  measure in its favour prior to this announcement. Black money forms a major part of all political parties funding.  In present time,  its not practically possible for a party,  especially national parties like BJP and Congress to contest elections with 100% legal funding. If it is so committed against black money,  why did BJP government went against bringing Political Parties funding under RTI? Charity should have begun at home!

Targeting small hoarders will not serve the purpose. Its the big corporate houses and industries and MNCs who are involved in corruption in form of under voicing and round tripping.  Catching a few of those big names would have served the purpose far better. Bureaucrats and politicians are not going to be the sufferers,  they had avenues to generate black money and also to convert into white through NGOs,  donations and what not. Its just small hoarders who are being targeted. The concept of Common but Differentiated Responsibility should have been fully Incorporates here

There is another link to this,  media gagging. Slapping a day ban on NDTV India after 9 months of incidence and then holding the order was just a method to warn media houses about the consequences they may face in case of non compliance of its circulars and instructions,  like the one,  i suppose,  is been sent to them instructing not to oppose the move under any circumstance and downplay any other person or party doing the same. One can easily recognize this. Media which has a habbit to promote most minor criticism of government action,  seems united and singing in same tone of “temporary suffering and sacrifice for greater good” . Even in the debate shows,  the anchors are not allowing the criticisms to have enough focus. 
Was is not possible to raid a few thousand of bureaucrats in the country simultaneously in a ‘surgical strike’  or a few hundreds of politicians to achieve similar objectives??  
That danger that i talked about in the beginning was about WRAPPING VESTED INTEREST IN THE CLOTH OF NATIONAL SERVICE.  UP being the most significant state in the Union which can even clear the roadblock that Government faces in Rajya Sabha,  is the real target.

It would not be wrong to call this move as “Coloured Anti Corruption Drive” 

URI ATTACK

SIX possible course of actions that india can and must consider

  1. Diplomatic offensive (already undertaken)
  2. Covert operations targetting the terrorists and organisations in anonymous fashion
  3. Cyber war-dewtroying its nuclear installations (double advantageous, as china would not be in position to support its candidature for NSG)
  4. Economic sanctions
  5. Withdrawal of all diplomatic and trade ties
  6. Reducing quantum of water pakistan gets through Indian rivers.

We must not be the escalator of war because, we have economic prosperity and growth to lose, pakistan has none. This is what pakistan exactly wishes to do, derail india growth and global status.

All out war unless world acknowledges pakistan’s invoolvement in attack would isolate india as an agggressor.

This is not a random attack, but a calculated one. this is very much obvious from the fact that the attackers were carrying goods made in pakistan. This shows that they want us to blame them, get anxious, and attack them. somethng smells fishy here. Its not at all difficult to provide attackers with medicines made in US or UK or Germany in todays world. This is not an innocent mistake, but a calculated misadventure.

Real Patriotism

The heated debate on ‘disrespecting’ national flag triggered by the incidence of defiance to stand by a family in a cinema hall of Mumbai lacks understanding of terms like patriotism, values, show off, respect & disrespect.

Patriotism is often linked to joining armed forces, police, saluting national flag or standing when national anthem is played, etc. Then the question arises, are others unpatriotic? Those who are not joining any forces or any services being disrespectful towards the nation? Certainly not. These are just the symbolic actions that we have attached to a particular value of patriotism. While a value is a subjective term differing from person to person, similarly the behaviour expressing a value varies from person to person. While standing for a national anthem may be a necessary condition for one to be patriotic, for others it may be feeling of love and affection inside for the fellow citizen and the constitution more important.

Not showing off respect does not mean disrespect. A child may not say to his parents that he loves them, but that does not mean he doesn’t! Values are the basis of behaviour one displays. While the spirit of constitution is to propagate this value, we often end up propagating just the symbolic action without the values. Compelling one to stand when national anthem is played in public is just the propaganda. Truer respect would be that a person’s respect for nation is so strong that he could not resist standing, irrespective of being in public or alone, when he hears national anthem being played. That binding force is what our great leaders always tried to propagate during the national movement. If they would have attached nationalism to just saluting national flag, probably we would not be having a flag at present.

As far as laws are concerned, if examined carefully, they restrict the citizens from disrespecting and not force them to display their respect. As our PM himself says, true service to nation can be in any form, even by saving electricity. Then why do we expect each and every one around us to follow and satisfy our point of view or our definition of respect and patriotism? Making an issue of not displaying respect as that of disrespect towards country is actually a disrespect towards the independence of a citizen and the collective sovereignty of  all which constitute the pride and honour of the national flag and national anthem.

COLONIALISM II

COLONIALISM-II IN INDIA : Similarities with previous :-

  1. Farmers sidelinedimages
  2. Rule of foreign company encouraged, domestic companies, production and export neglected
  3. Communal disharmony by government allies
  4. Scientific backwardness
  5. False feeling of pride been propagated based on mythological stories
  6. Orthodox education policy being adopted
  7. Censorship of books
  8. Top posts only for government’s well wishers
  9. Fundamental Right to freedom of speech and dissent restricted
  10. Visible government is controlled by a third party organisation (RSS)

Last time it resulted in partition……


Secular Flag of India

‘Saffron’ & ‘Green’ partitioned India in 1947, but even today both have equ1350px-Flag_of_India.svgal space on the national flag, united by ‘White’ (Peace). This is what we are proud to be.

Any attempt to ‘distort’ their spaces covered will distort the whole ‘flag’.

Hope the communal forces and their supporters will someday understand this.

For a change this time, Silence is louder than words!!

Dear Prime Minister Narendra Modi, you need to understand that you are no more a Chief Minister of a state of Union of India but The Prime Minister of India. More than exagerated words of yours, your silence speaks, dometically and internationally… Hugging international leaders would not earn you or My India respect, but hugging people of all section and religion of society will certainly do.

#Modi #india #secularism

Historic Achievement?

Celebrating Mumbai Terror “Mastermind’s” eximagesecution?? Think on some questions:
  1. How are we different from those who committed the heinous crime in 1993? Main idea was to punish, or to kill?
  2. This is said to be exemplary to any terrorist that in India they would be treated like this. Cant it be taken the other way round? Any person accused of terror activity, later due to introspection or guilt, decides to surrender or help the investigating agency in any possible manner, would now restrain from doing this. What exactly did we achieve?
  3. If capital punishment was the only option, why did not we have enough humanity and mercy to give sufficient time to the culprit to at least be mentally prepared? Giving final decisions and judgments hours before execution and striking rays of hope one by one, is this what we call human justice?
  4. Making execution of a person a national event, telecasting each and every detail, required or not, to the public and showcasing it as a moment of celebration, is this what freedom of press is for?
  5. 257 were killed in blasts, killing sons, daughters, husbands of many. If that was condemnable, and punishable, then why celebrate if cant mourn his execution? He was also a father to someone, husband of someone and those some ones are citizens of India too!

What did we achieve from this? Our objective is end of terror or terrorist??

Cancer Of Child Labour

Child labour pic
A farmer can never expect a high yield if sown seeds are diseased. Then why do we expect our future, our country to prosper at unprecedented rate when we are not protecting our seeds and allowing them to rot like they is some unwanted shrubs?
Every political party prepare a list of hot agendas for their election campaign, promises of development, insurance at cheap rate, pension plans for senior citizens, inflation, over hauling of defence system, caste based reservation, building temples, mosques, metro lines, cheap homes and what not. One thing that most of us don’t notice is that, they never make promises about abolishing child labour completely. They never keep this high on their agenda that they would work hard for the freedom and liberation of children who are forced into the hell of child labour. Have we ever given it a thought why is that so? Its simple, because Right to Vote is given after 18 years, so all the schemes are for them.
But who is to take care about those initial 18 years of the underprivileged children which define the rest of the life? Seldom this topic of child labour is debated, even in media, mostly when there is nothing much happening in the country. And when it is questioned, the robotic answer that is distributed is “laws are there, system is there and its working.  We will further enhance it because children are our future and prime target and blah blah… “. Do we still buy those words?
First of all, various Acts and laws which are prevalent in the country are extremely weak and vague. It wouldn’t be wrong to say that they are combination of loop holes, which are too easily distorted and misused. Whatever a little effectiveness it can create is lost due to secondary importance given to its implementation, personal relations of the culprit with the caretakers of law and last but not the least – greed, insensitivity and carelessness of common people, including me and you!
Child labour is an act of crime constitutionally which we break and allow others to break religiously. Government has excuse that they don’t get complaints against it. Are they really serious? The children selling newapaper on streets, serving food and water in dhabas and restaurants, polishing shoes, begging on streets and stations, selling flowers, working as slaves right at their neighbourhood, are those not children? Or do they expect those very kids to come to them and complain themselves? Height of negligence is that child labour can be seen frequently in the premises of Court of Law.
Isn’t it our responsibility to report these incidences? Our one courageous step could save a life. Every child is innocent and has right to respectable life. It is our carelessness and government’s negligence which is responsible for all the miseries and humiliations that those human beings bear for the rest of their life. Why do we have lakhs of crores to spend on defence projects when there’s no war, crores to spend on celebrating Yoga Day and other occasion when these children are struggling and working for survival. Child labour is not always forced, but sometime by choice for the survival. Probably this is the reason sometimes we resist complaining. But who is responsible in the end? Surely not those kids.

There are numerous laws and Acts in India which restricts child labour. Some of them are:

The Factories Act of 1948: The Act prohibits the employment of children below the age of 14 years in any factory. The law also placed rules on who, when and how long can pre-adults aged 15–18 years be employed in any factory.
The Mines Act of 1952: The Act prohibits the employment of children below 18 years of age in a mine.
The Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act of 1986: The Act prohibits the employment of children below the age of 14 years in hazardous occupations identified in a list by the law. The list was expanded in 2006, and again in 2008.
The Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) of Children Act of 2000: This law made it a crime, punishable with a prison term, for anyone to procure or employ a child in any hazardous employment or in bondage.
The Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act of 2009: The law mandates free and compulsory education to all children aged 6 to 14 years. This legislation also mandated that 25 percent of seats in every private school must be allocated for children from disadvantaged groups and physically challenged children.

There are many more. Despite these laws, according to recent census, there are more than 5 million child labours currently in India, and we all know how honest and true these government figures are!

These laws concentrate more on restricting child labour in hazardous places, which is good, that should be the first priority. But why there are less and ambiguous rules for others working in non hazardous areas? Child labour irrespective of type or work, destroys not only childhood but the entire life. Moreover, these laws lay down various conditions like the age, health, type of work etc. to classify whether a child can work on not, but this completely lacks a reliable framework which could provide honest collection of information about these parameters.

A child, suggests UNICEF, is involved in child labour activities if between 5 to 11 years of age, he or she did at least one hour of economic activity or at least 28 hours of domestic work in a week, and in case of children between 12 to 14 years of age, he or she did at least 14 hours of economic activity or at least 42 hours of economic activity and domestic work per week. Who is  calculating these hours or who is monitoring? A kid of age around 10 don’t even have the knowledge nor the courage to file a complaint if he is made to over work, then who?

What are the root causes of child labour? If we suppose in our “virtual” world that people start reporting incidences of child labour and police start taking expected actions, will everything improve? No!
The situation will improve when government prepare plans to eradicate the root causes of child labour, which are poverty, corruption, lack of schools, basic facilities to children etc. Thousands of schools are opened every year, but most of them survive only on paper. Which successfully make their way up to reality don’t have teacher. The teachers which are employed at high wages by the government are either virtually attending the classes or are not qualified enough. The mid day meal, a well appreciated initiative of Indian Government could not withstand the cancer of corruption. The food grains supplied for the schools are either of lowest possible quality, or is sold away by the very administration and teacher of the schools which were endowed with the responsibility to feed the students.  Apart from schools, the financial conditions of the guardians are so awful sometimes that the child has to grow faster than nature allows him. In order to feed, children are forced to work and earn. There are ration shops to supply cheap sugar, rice, kerosene etc., but nothing in India can escape from corruption.

But its not dark everywhere. The NGOs have worked exceptionally well in last decade towards the eradication of child labour. Hats off to them, but we cannot leave everything to them. There is little service that we can do for these gifts of god :
From today onwards, every time you leave a tip in restaurant, or every time you eat unwillingly, very time you leave food on your plate, every time you give away your change to a professional beggar, every time you spend even a single penny which is not necessary, just give a thought what that extra change or that extra food or that extra clothe would mean to a child who sacrifices his/her childhood and work day and night to earn two square meals and fundamental rights which have been promised by the Constitution as birth right. Donate that extra penny to help these under privileged children overcome their poverty and go to a school. You are not expected to give away your property, but you are also not expected to give away your honesty, at least for these kids.
Lets not forget, all of us who are able to read this, have been brought up like a flower in a nursery, that does not mean, flowers outside have lesser potential or lesser right to survive or blossom and spread fragrance all around.

Does Hema Malini Deserve All The Criticism?

After the sorrowful accident which an innocent girl of age 4 died and her family critically injured, there was a wave oAccident victimsf criticism all over social media against Hema Malini for a number of reasons. Hema Malini’s car crashed with an alto in which an innocent family was traveling that day. In that accident, a girl of age 4 died, her family was injured critically, Hema Malini too was injured with fractured nose, her driver was arrested. Right after the incidence, Hema Malini was taken to a private hospital in Jaipur and the victim family to a government hospital in Dausa. She received utmost care and attention of the people and authorities present there, while the victim family was somewhat treated casually and ignored. The father of the kid accused with grief filled heart, if her daughter was provided with equal care and was taken to hospital along with Hema Malini, she would have survived.

After all this, whole social media stood up against Hema Malini and criticised her. Is that totally just? Is she only responsible for the partiality? Who is to be blamed at first?

It is the public and the authorities physically present there who should be blamed before #HemaMalini. It was their duty and their decision whom to save first, whom to take to hospital first, who is more injured, who is critical? They are the one who are to be held responsible before any one. Hema Malini too was injured, her nose was fractured and in such cases, victims usually panic and are unable to make right decision. Because she is a celebrity, she received VIP treatment, but who gave? It was the public! It was their sick mentality which forced them to weigh a celebrity’s fractured nose heavier than an ordinary kid’s life. Then why blame the celebrity? Did she say that she wont take the kid with her? She may have expected the same treatment for the victim family, unaware of the intentions of people! When she was supposed to be treated like an ordinary person, she was given priority which at the end resulted in loss of life of an innocent kid and now she is criticized excessively because she is a celebrity? Have we totally lost it? Are we so blind?

People are commenting that she did not even inquire about the victim family, would that make any difference? Would that bring back the life?

Before criticizing anybody, we need to introspect! How good are we? Did we fulfill our duty honestly? It was the driver’s mistake because of whom accident happened, not Hema Malini. If the public would have treated that innocent sweet little kid with equal importance as that of their favorite celebrity, she might have survived.